Dose-response association of physical activity with acute myocardial infarction: do amount and intensity matter?

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to analyze the dose-response association between leisure time physical activity (PA) practice and myocardial infarction (MI), considering not only the total amount but also the amount of PA at different levels of intensity, and to determine whether these associations were modified by age. METHOD: In a population-based age- and sex-matched case-control study, all first acute MI patients aged 25 to 74 years were prospectively registered in four Spanish hospitals between 2002 and 2004. Controls were randomly selected from population-based samples recruited during the same period of time. The Minnesota PA questionnaire was administered to assess total energy expenditure in PA and in light-, moderate-, and high-intensity PA. RESULTS: Finally, 1339 cases and 1339 controls were included. The association between PA and MI likelihood was non-linear, with significantly lower MI odds at low practice levels (≥ 500 MET·min/week), lowest odds around 1500 MET·min/week, and a plateau thereafter. Light- (in subjects older than 64 years), moderate-, and high-intensity PA produced similar benefits. CONCLUSION: Most of the population could reduce their likelihood of MI by engaging in PA at a moderate level of intensity or, in individuals older than 64 years, at a light level of intensity.

Balanço energético em crianças e adolescentes com bronquiolite obliterante pós-infecciosa / Energy balance in children and adolescents with post-infectious bronchiolitis obliterans

OBJETIVOS: Quantificar o gasto e estimar a ingestão energética de crianças e adolescentes com bronquiolite obliterante pós-infecciosa e comparar com crianças e adolescentes hígidos. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal com 72 crianças e adolescentes de 8 a 18 anos. Compararam-se dois grupos de 36 indivíduos - um com diagnóstico de bronquiolite obliterante e outro hígido -, os quais foram pareados pelo sexo, idade e classificação do índice de massa corporal. Para avaliação nutricional, utilizaram-se a antropometria e a composição corporal. O gasto energético foi medido pela calorimetria indireta; o fator atividade, pelo recordatório 24h de atividades físicas, e a ingestão energética, pelos inquéritos alimentares. RESULTADOS: O grupo com bronquiolite obliterante e o grupo-controle apresentaram respectivamente: índice de massa corporal de M=18,9, DP=4,0kg/m² e M=18,8, DP=3,4kg/m²; gasto energético de repouso de M=1717,6, DP=781,5 e M=2019,9, DP=819; gasto energético total de M=2677,5, DP=1514,0kcal/dia e M=3396,1, DP=1557,9kcal/dia; estimativa da ingestão energética de M=2294,1, DP=746,7kcal/dia e M=2116,5, DP=612,1kcal/dia. O gasto energético de repouso (p=0,102) e o gasto energético total (p=0,051) não foram diferentes entre os grupos, mesmo quando ajustados pela massa magra. Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre o o gasto energético total e o consumo energético no grupo com bronquiolite obliterante (p=0,202). O grupo-controle consumiu menos calorias do que o previsto pelo gasto energético total (p<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: O gasto energético de repouso e o gasto energético total foram semelhantes entre os grupos. A estimativa da ingestão energética dos hígidos foi menor que o gasto energético total. O grupo com bronquiolite obliterante apresentava um balanço energético adequado.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the energy expenditure and estimate the energy intake of children and adolescents with post-infectious bronchiolitis obliterans and compare them with those of healthy children and adolescents. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 36 children and adolescents with bronchiolitis obliterans aged 8 to 18 years, and a control group with 36 healthy individuals matched for sex, age and body mass index. Anthropometric data were collected from all individuals. Energy expenditure was determined by indirect calorimetry, activity factor was estimated by a 24-hour record of physical activities, and energy intake was estimated by the 24-hour food recall. RESULTS: Data for the bronchiolitis obliterans and control groups are, respectively: body mass index of M=18.9, SD=4.0kg/m² and M=18.8, SD=3.4kg/m²; resting energy expenditure of M=1717.6, SD=781.5kcal/day and M=2019.9, SD=819kcal/day; total energy expenditure of M=2677.5, SD=1514.0kcal/day and M=3396.1, SD=1557.9kcal/day; estimated energy intake of M=2294.1, SD=746.7kcal/day and M=2116.5, SD=612.1kcal/day. Resting energy expenditure (p=0.102) and total energy expenditure (p=0.051) did not differ between the groups, even when adjusted for lean mass. Total energy expenditure and intake of the bronchiolitis obliterans group did not differ significantly (p=0.202). Energy intake by the control group was lower than expected according to their total energy expenditure (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The resting energy expenditure and total energy expenditure of the two groups were similar. The estimated energy intake of the control group was lower than their total energy expenditure. The bronchiolitis obliterans group had an appropriate energy balance.